# Summary Of Baptism In The Sixth Century. · Page 8 of 9

[Previous page: SUMMARY OF BAPTISM IN THE SIXTH CENTURY.](/en/stories/mm-summary-of-baptism-in-the-sixth-century/part-7/) · [Book contents](/en/sources/martyrs-mirror/#book-contents) · [Next page: SUMMARY OF BAPTISM IN THE SIXTH CENTURY.](/en/stories/mm-summary-of-baptism-in-the-sixth-century/part-9/)

He finally adds the wish addressed by the teacher
to God, saying: “The holy God give you holiness
with this seal wherewith you are sealed, and mark
you with the ring of a sweet-smelling anointing, by
this baptism wherewith you are baptized; may he
make you worthy of his kingdom, and crown you,
instead of this perishable crown, with the crown of
righteousness and every good work.”

Having quoted this much, Jacob Mehrning says:
“All this is utterly inapplicable to infant baptism.”
Bapt. Hist., page 486.

Same year as above.—It is stated that about this
time there also lived Theophilus Alexandrinus, who,
it appears, held views entirely different from those of
the Roman church, with regard to baptism as well as
to the holy Supper; so that he wrote against the
manifold adjurations which were wont to be connected
with the consecrating of the baptismal water,
as also against transubstantiation or the essential
change of the bread into the body of Christ, as follows:
“A false Christian (namely, one who deems adjurations
over the baptismal water necessary), does not
consider that the water, in holy baptism, is sanctified
by the word of God (which was wont to be spoken to
the candidates who confessed the faith), and the advent
of the Holy Ghost; and that the bread of the
Lord, by which the body of our Savior is signified,
and which we break for our sanctification, is consecrated
through invocation of the Lord.” Observe
he does not say, transubstantiated, but consecrated.[122](/en/stories/mm-footnotes/part-10/#Footnote_122)
See Bapt. Hist., page 486, from D. J. Vicecomes,
lib. 1, cap. 14.

A. D. 586.—Long since, namely, for the year
317, we cited Donatus, and showed, according to
Seb. Franck, Chron. Rom. Kill., letter D., that he
was a very learned Bishop of Carthage, a native of
Numidia, and that he taught that the Pope and his
adherents did not have a Christian church, and, consequently,
no true baptism; and hence held that
those who had been baptized in the Roman church,
needed to be rebaptized, saying that there was only
one church, one baptism, one faith, one Gospel, and
that no children should be baptized, but only believing
adults who desired baptism. At first almost all
Africa adhered to him. See the place indicated
above.

This doctrine, however, did not die with him, seeing
mention is made of his followers much later (namely
A. D. 586), that they at that time, under the leadership
of one Peter, Bishop of Apamia, rebaptized
those who had been baptized by the orthodox (or
Catholic) church. See concerning this, P. J. Twisck,
Chron., 6th book, page 201, col. 1, from Greg. lib.
8, Merul., fol. 446. Also our account for the
year 548.

NOTE.—-The followers of Donatus, of whom we
speak here, have of old been severely accused by
their opponents of gross errors, tyranny, &c., but
are acquitted thereof by other celebrated authors.
Nevertheless, we would not accept them in every
respect, but only in those of their teachings which
are good and true.

H. Bullinger compares them throughout to the
Anabaptists, or as he calls them Baptists, saying:
“Here our Baptists again disclose their ignorance,
when they teach that no one should be compelled
to that which is good, or to the faith;” and, continuing,
he says: “They resemble the ancient Baptists,
the Donatists, in every respect.” “These,” he
writes further, “were of the opinion, that heretics
should be allowed to live without restraint and with
impunity in their faith;” that is, without persecution
or blood shedding. They were opposed by Augustine.
H. Bulling., lib. 5, fol. 216, 222.[123](/en/stories/mm-footnotes/part-10/#Footnote_123)

As to the accusations formerly brought against
their faith as well as their life, these have been refuted
by several prominent authors. “It would be desirable,”
writes P. J. Twisck, “if we ourselves had their
writings, doctrines, and deeds; for, if it is true, that
they resemble the Baptists in every respect, and are
not willing that any one should be compelled in matters
of faith.” It is therefore sufficiently, as Bullinger
says, evident, that they were unjustly accused.
Chron., 5th book, page 147, col. 2. This is more
fully spoken of in the account for the year 317.

About A. D. 600.—We will now bring the history
of baptism in the sixth century to a close. We would
adduce more writers in confirmation of said matter,
but we fear that many authors of that time did not
write faithfully and uprightly; besides, that many of
their descendants, in order to give color to infant
baptism and similar doctrines, appear to have corrupted
their writings, of which many excellent men
have complained.

Jacob Mehrning, in his Indachtigmaeckinge over
het Doopsel, of the 6th century, says: “Thus the
Centuriatores Magdeburgenses, also the two doctors,
Calixtus and Brandanus Detrius, in their disputations
about baptism, must themselves confess
that in this century, and much longer, the Christian
novices were divided into two classes, as in the primitive
church, which observed a distinction between
the catechumens and believing applicants for baptism,
or the “elect,” as they were called by the
ancients.



## Original source

[Read this passage on Project Gutenberg](https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/65855/pg65855-images.html#FNanchor_122)

[Edition details](https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/65855)

[Previous page: SUMMARY OF BAPTISM IN THE SIXTH CENTURY.](/en/stories/mm-summary-of-baptism-in-the-sixth-century/part-7/) · [Book contents](/en/sources/martyrs-mirror/#book-contents) · [Next page: SUMMARY OF BAPTISM IN THE SIXTH CENTURY.](/en/stories/mm-summary-of-baptism-in-the-sixth-century/part-9/)

---

Page: https://history.truechristian.church/en/stories/mm-summary-of-baptism-in-the-sixth-century/part-8/

[Contribute a correction or addition](https://github.com/trueChristian/history.truechristian.church/issues/new?title=Correction%3A+Summary+Of+Baptism+In+The+Sixth+Century.+%C2%B7+Page+8+of+9&body=%23%23+Page+or+topic%0ASummary+Of+Baptism+In+The+Sixth+Century.+%C2%B7+Page+8+of+9%0A%0APage%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fhistory.truechristian.church%2Fen%2Fstories%2Fmm-summary-of-baptism-in-the-sixth-century%2Fpart-8%2F%0A%0ARecord%3A+mm-summary-of-baptism-in-the-sixth-century--b00181-o000000%0A%0ADate+currently+shown%3A+6th+century+%28source+section%29%0A%0A%23%23+Correction+or+addition%0A%0A%0A%0A%23%23+Sources+and+evidence%0APlease+include+book%2Fpage+references%2C+archive+links%2C+or+first-hand+documentation.%0A%0A%0A%0A%23%23+Image+credit+%28if+applicable%29%0ACreator%2C+source%2C+and+permission+or+public-domain+basis.%0A%0A%0A%0ASubmitted+for+review%3B+this+issue+does+not+publish+changes+automatically.)
