# That They Nevertheless Professed A Good Confession. · Page 1 of 2

[Previous page: THAT THE WALDENSES WHO HAD BEEN UNITED WITH THEM, CALLED TABORITES, WERE NOT RECEIVED BY THEIR OLD BRETHREN, AND WHY.](/en/stories/mm-that-the-waldenses-who-had-been-united-with-them-called-taborites-were-not-received-by-their-old-brethren-and-why/) · [Book contents](/en/sources/martyrs-mirror/#book-contents) · [Next page: THAT THEY NEVERTHELESS PROFESSED A GOOD CONFESSION.](/en/stories/mm-that-they-nevertheless-professed-a-good-confession/part-2/)

Nevertheless, these Taborites, because of their
aversion to war and the superstitions, had separated
from the Hussites, and also truly held in those
times, as cannot be inferred otherwise, the true confession
of the Waldenses, although, as it is thought,
some endeavored to force in infant baptism among
them; however, their confession in regard to this
article, delivered in the year 1431, at Prague, in Bohemia,
to M. John Rockenzahn, makes no mention
at all of it, yea, they employ such expressions
therein as is utterly impossible to apply to infant
baptism.

In J. Mehrning’s History of Baptism, p. 611,
we read these words: “I have before me the confession
of the Taborites, drawn up A. D. 1431,
which in all respects agrees with our doctrine, and
which I intend to have printed at the proper time.”

Concerning the difference between the Hussites
proper and Taborites, who were united with them,
D. Balthazar Lydius gives this explanation: “The
followers of John Huss were divided into two sects,
the one called Praguers, the other Taborites; of
whom the Taborites were the stricter. Tract entitled:
‘Where the church was before the year 1160,
or before the time of the Waldenses;’ printed in
the year 1624, p. 25.”

Their confession is as follows: “First, concerning
the sacrament of baptism,—which is the first
sacrament by which God imparts, especially the
first sacramental grace, if we are spiritually regenerated;
because it is a sign of the spiritual regeneration
proceeding from God,—we hold, according to the
tenor of the holy Scriptures, and sincerely confess
from the heart, that the sacrament of baptism is the
ablution of man, performed by another with water,
who pronounces the words prescribed by Christ,
which effectually signify the ablution of the soul
from sin, which is expressly founded in the Gospel;
for Christ, with words as well as by deed, taught
that those who believe in him should be thus baptized.
He taught this with words when he said
to the apostles: ‘Go ye therefore and teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.’ Matthew,
23:19. He taught it by deed when he himself
was baptized by John, in Jordan. Matt. 3. Bapt.
Hist., second part, pp. 743, 744, from B. Lyd.
Wald., pp. 10, 11.

A. D. 1431.—At this time, also Scotland, though
otherwise very superstitious, experienced no inconsiderable
reformation in the true worship of God,
which was effected by various persons zealous for
the honor of God and the welfare of his church. So
that some resolved and endeavored to reform not
only the article of baptism, which was shamefully,
and not less to the detriment of many innocent
souls, abused by the Roman church, but also
various other articles which, from sheer superstition,
were maintained by them according to human opinion.
They were determined to retain the good, and
abolish the evil.

Among those who at this time undertook the
reformation of the same, one Paul Craus is especially
mentioned, who also opposed auricular confession,
the invocation of the saints, the idolatrous
sacrament, etc. For this he was condemned as a
heretic; but how he finally ended will be shown
at the right time and place. Compare the account
in the fifteenth book van den Ondergang, p. 796,
col. 1, with Vinc. Cal., fol. 368, Georg. Pac. c. 11.
Herm. Mod., fol. 274.

Note.—Whether this Paul Craus was fully enlightened
in all other articles pertaining to the worship
of God, we cannot definitely prove; even as, on
the other hand, we have found nothing which might
tend to derogate his belief; though we have sought
in good faith for that which would be derogatory to
him; as well as for that which would make him
acceptable; hence we have deemed it well to accord
also to him a place among the good confessors
of the evangelical truth.

A. D. 1455.—About this time there were many
Waldenses (erroneously called Wandois) in Germany,
in the bishopric of Reichstadt, of whose
orthodox confession an account was given for the
year 1170. They had among them twelve preachers,
or teachers, of their religion, who, each in
his district, went out secretly, on account of the
severe persecution, to preach. P. J. Twisck, Chron.,
p. 829, col. 2, from Henr. Boxh., fol. 27.

Note.—A. D. 1460.—At this time Roderic
Simotensus severely reproved the human institutions
and abuses of the papists, such as excommunication,
fasts, feasts, auricular confession, and the
mass, as appears from his book, entitled The Mirror
326
of Human Life. Chron., van den Ondergang,
p. 835, col. 1.

Again, same year as above; Nicholas Siculus said
at this time, that a believing person who rightly
adduces the holy Scripture should be believed more
than the Pope, and a whole council that rejects the
holy Scripture. He further said, that a council may
err; also, that some of the popes lived as though
they did not believe that there would be a resurrection
of the flesh after this life. See the aforementioned
chronicle, in the place indicated, taken from
Joh. Munst., fol. 190.



## Original source

[Read this passage on Project Gutenberg](https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/65855/pg65855-images.html#Page_326)

[Edition details](https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/65855)

[Previous page: THAT THE WALDENSES WHO HAD BEEN UNITED WITH THEM, CALLED TABORITES, WERE NOT RECEIVED BY THEIR OLD BRETHREN, AND WHY.](/en/stories/mm-that-the-waldenses-who-had-been-united-with-them-called-taborites-were-not-received-by-their-old-brethren-and-why/) · [Book contents](/en/sources/martyrs-mirror/#book-contents) · [Next page: THAT THEY NEVERTHELESS PROFESSED A GOOD CONFESSION.](/en/stories/mm-that-they-nevertheless-professed-a-good-confession/part-2/)

---

Page: https://history.truechristian.church/en/stories/mm-that-they-nevertheless-professed-a-good-confession/

[Contribute a correction or addition](https://github.com/trueChristian/history.truechristian.church/issues/new?title=Correction%3A+That+They+Nevertheless+Professed+A+Good+Confession.+%C2%B7+Page+1+of+2&body=%23%23+Page+or+topic%0AThat+They+Nevertheless+Professed+A+Good+Confession.+%C2%B7+Page+1+of+2%0A%0APage%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fhistory.truechristian.church%2Fen%2Fstories%2Fmm-that-they-nevertheless-professed-a-good-confession%2F%0A%0ARecord%3A+mm-that-they-nevertheless-professed-a-good-confession%0A%0ADate+currently+shown%3A+15th+century+%28source+section%29%0A%0A%23%23+Correction+or+addition%0A%0A%0A%0A%23%23+Sources+and+evidence%0APlease+include+book%2Fpage+references%2C+archive+links%2C+or+first-hand+documentation.%0A%0A%0A%0A%23%23+Image+credit+%28if+applicable%29%0ACreator%2C+source%2C+and+permission+or+public-domain+basis.%0A%0A%0A%0ASubmitted+for+review%3B+this+issue+does+not+publish+changes+automatically.)
