# Tertullian’S Views Concerning Different Other Matters, According To The Account Of P. J. Twisck.

3rd century (source section) · Historical source

Source: Martyrs’ Mirror. Original heading: TERTULLIAN’S VIEWS CONCERNING DIFFERENT OTHER MATTERS, ACCORDING TO THE ACCOUNT OF P. J. TWISCK.

Century of containing source section; exact event date not assigned

“Tertullian,” says Twisck, “exhorts Christian
women, in a book written to his wife, not to enter
into marriage relations with the heathen, saying that
it is impossible for them to live long in peace and
friendship. He says: ‘What must the heathen husband
think, when he sees, or hears it said that his
wife kisses on the cheek the first Christian whom
she happens to meet?’ ”

“Again, In a book on patience, when speaking
of the apostates and of withdrawing from them, he
says that patience governs all manner of salutary
doctrines, and remarks: ‘What wonder then, that it
also serves to repentance to those who are wont to
come to the help of the apostate, whether it be man
or wife, when separated one from another, nevertheless
by such things as are lawful, to be led to
maintain their widow or widowerhood. It is patience
that waits for repentance, hopes for it and exhorts
to it those who would yet at some time attain to
salvation. How great the benefit it confers upon
both—the one it preserves from adultery, the other
it reforms.’96 Again he says: ‘Do you think that
it is hard for a Christian to suffer? He would rather
die himself, than to kill others; and if you smite a
Christian, he glories in it.’ ”

“Again, ‘As the religion of others does not concern
us, and neither profits nor harms us; therefore,
it does not become any one religion to force itself
upon another, since it must be accepted voluntarily,
and not by coercion, for what is required is the
offering of a willing mind.’ ” (This agrees with Ex.
25, 35 and 36. Chr. Leonh., lib. 1. Seb. Fr. in the
Arke fol. 174. Stand der Religie, lib. 4. Grond.
Bew. letter B. Menn. Sym. Doop. C., fol. 8. Th.
Imbroek, fol. 28.)

“Again, Tertullian (in his fourth book against
Marcion) quoting the words of Christ: This is my
body, that is, a figure of my body, says: ‘It would
not have been a figure, had his body not been real;
for a phantasm, or mere illusion, cannot have a
figure or shadow?’ With this he means to prove
that Christ had a real body; and what he here calls
117a figure, he, in the fifth book, calls a sacrament,
with the express words: ‘The bread and the cup.’
Still more clearly he says in the first book: ‘Neither
did he despise or reject the bread, by which he
represented or typified his body.’

“He says: ‘These words of Christ: This is my
body, we must understand as though Christ had
said: This is the sign and figure of my body.’ I
pass over Dionysius Alexandrinus, and Paulinus,
who both treat in the same manner of the above
sacrament.’ ” Tertul. Apolog., cap. 39. Euseb. lib. 6
and 9. Daniel Saut., lib. 1, cap. 6.

“Again, Tertullian says: ‘We must not seek the
faith from the persons, but prove the persons by the
faith.’ ” De Præscript., lib. 4. P. J. Twisck, Chron.
2d book, page 53, col. 1, 2.

Note.—Tertullian taught at this time: “We have
the apostles for authors, who established nothing
according to their own inclination, but faithfully
taught the nations that which they had received
from God.” Lib. 1. Præscript.

He writes further, that “all churches are apostolic
churches, though they may have been founded long
after the time of the apostles, if they have but kinship
with the doctrine.” Lib. 1. Præsc. See Samuel
Veltius, in the Geslacht-register der Roomscher
Successie, second edition, 1649 pages 115, 116.

Tertullian says among other things: “The emperors
would have believed in Christ, if the world
had not prevented them; for they could not become
Christians, because they had to serve the world,
and carry on war.” See, Grondelijke Verklaringe
Danielis ende Johannis, printed at Harlem, 1635,
on Tertullian.

Vicecomes, in his first book on baptism, chap. 1,
notes the following testimony from Tertullian (lib. 1,
cap. 4.): “There is no difference between those
whom John baptized in Jordan and those Peter
baptized in the Tiber.” With this he intends to
prove that in the first days of Christianity there
were neither baptismal fonts nor churches. J. M.,
Baptism. Hist., page 275.

Again says Tertullian: “Thus, when we go into
the water of baptism, we justly confess our sins and
the Christian faith.” Vicecom., lib. 4, cap. 7, and
J. M., Baptism. Hist., page 277.

These last two passages from Tertullian we have
adduced over and above what was necessary, but
they are not useless, since they confirm what we
have said above about baptism; for by the first the
superstition which was wont to be connected with
the water, the baptismal font, and the church in
which baptism was administered, is removed, or at
least (per consequentiam) controverted; and the
second states that it is proper to confess our sins,
and the Christian faith, at baptism. And therewith
he proves that it is not proper to be baptized without
confessing one’s sins, and the Christian faith.
What has been said is sufficient for the intelligent.
With this we take our leave of Tertullian.

A. D. 224.—Leonilla, a Christian grandmother,
had three grandsons, Sosyphus, Cleosyphus, and
Melosyphus. She begged Romigius that he would
instruct the three lads in the Christian faith, and
then baptize them. This was done in a godly
manner. P. J. Twisck, Chron. for the year 224,
3d book, page 60, col. 1, from Grond. Bew., letter B.
Also, Kort verhæl van den loop der werelt, printed
1611, page 47.

From this it will be seen, that at that time and
place Christians were not in the habit of having
their children or grandchildren baptized, unless
these had reached riper years, and been instructed
in the faith, which, when they confessed it, they
were baptized upon. This should be borne in mind.

A. D. 231.—At this time there flourished as a
writer the celebrated Origen, surnamed Adamantius,
who, treating on baptism, writes thus (Homil. 6,
super. Ezechidem) on Ezekiel, 16:4: ”‘Neither
wast thou washed in water to supple thee,’ etc.:
We, who have received the grace of baptism in the
name of Jesus Christ, are washed unto salvation.
Simon was washed, and when he had received baptism,
continued with Philip; but not being washed
unto salvation, he was condemned by him who
through the Holy Ghost said to him: ‘Thy money
perish with thee.’ It is a matter of great importance
that he who is washed, be washed unto salvation.

“Be very heedful of this, ye catechumens, or
learners, and prepare yourselves by what is told
you while you are yet under instruction and unbaptized;
and then come to the washing of water,
and be washed unto salvation. But be not washed
as some, who are washed, but not unto salvation;
like those who receive the water, but not the Holy
Ghost.

“He that is washed unto salvation, receives the
water and the Holy Ghost.

“Because Simon was not washed unto salvation,
he received the water, and not the Holy Ghost; for
he thought he could purchase the gift of the Holy
Ghost with money, wherein he was not washed
unto salvation.

“That which we now read as having been spoken
at Jerusalem, is addressed to every sinful soul that
seems to believe.” Also, H. Mont. Nietigh.,
pp. 36, 37.

The above words of Origen indicate the manner
of baptism which prevailed in his time, namely, that
the candidates for baptism were first catechumens,
that is, learners, who were instructed in the faith,
and had to prepare themselves to this end, before
they were baptized. For, when he says: “Be very
heedful of this, ye catechumens, or learners, and
prepare yourselves by what is told you while you
are yet under instruction and unbaptized; and then
come to the washing of water,” etc., what else is
meant by it, than that it confirms what John required
of those who came to him to be baptized,
saying: “Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance,”
Matt. 3:8; that is, prepare yourselves
by a true reformation of life, so that you may receive
baptism worthily.

Then, on the words, Ezek. 16:5: “But thou wast
cast out in the open field,” etc., he (Origen) comments
thus: “If we sin again after the washing of
regeneration, we are cast away, according to the
word of God, in the day that we are born: such
are frequently found, who, after they have been
118
washed by the washing of regeneration, do not
bring forth fruits meet for repentance; nor do they
live up to the mystery of baptism, with more fear
than they had while they were yet catechumens, or
learners; or with more love than they exercised
when they were still hearers of the word; or with
holier deeds than they performed before. Beloved,
observe what is said in the text: ‘Thou wast cast
out in the open field, for the wickedness of thy soul,
in the day that thou wast born.’ ” H. Mont., same
page as above.

By these words he confirms the import of his
former declaration, namely, “That those who are to
be baptized, must first be catechumens, or learners,
and, being baptized, they must be truly regenerated;”
and thus he calls baptism “the washing of
regeneration,” even as Paul, Tit. 3:5.

Moreover, he complains that those who were
washed by the washing of regeneration, did not
bring forth fruits meet for repentance. By this he
certainly means to say, that the baptized person
must be truly converted, and bring forth good fruits.
But how can he be converted, that is, turn from his
error, who never has erred? And how can it be
demanded of him to bring forth good fruits, who
cannot be accused of ever having brought forth bad
fruits? Hence it is evident that he does not say this
with reference to the baptism of infants, since these,
having never erred, or brought forth bad fruits,
cannot, through baptism, be required to turn from
error, and bring forth better fruits than they have
brought forth before.

That such baptism, accompanied with the mortifying
of the flesh, and resurrection unto a new life,
is taught and commended by Origen, is clearly expressed
in his comments on Rom. 6:3: “Know ye
not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus
Christ were baptized into his death?” where he
says: “But it seems to me that the apostle in this
chapter does not prefix even the words: ‘Know ye
not’ without a purpose. He thereby proves that at
that time, that is, in the days of the apostles, it was
not as it is now, that those who were baptized,
received only the outward figure of the mysteries,
but that also the power and intent of the same was
imparted to them, and this to those who understood
it, and had been instructed concerning it: that those
who are baptized, are baptized into the death of
Christ, and buried with him by baptism; and that
those who are baptized must walk in newness of
life, even as Christ rose from the dead, through the
glory of the Father.” Also, H. Mont. page 37.

This is certainly expressing plainly and unequivocally,
of what baptism he is treating,97 namely, of
such a baptism, of which the power and intent was
imparted to those who understood it; by which
they were buried into the death; by which they
were raised, to walk in newness of life, etc., all of
which are things that cannot be comprehended,
much less undertaken and carried out, by infants.
In this manner he speaks also in other places, as,
for instance, in Homilia 5, 4th and 5th chapters of
the book Joshua. Again, Homil. 9, 8th and 9th
chapters; Homil. 15, 11th chap. Also, Homil. 7,
15th chap. of the book of Judges. B. Hist. p. 291.





---

Page: http://history.truechristian.church/stories/mm-tertullians-views-concerning-different-other-matters-according-to-the-account-of-p-j-twisck/

[Contribute a correction or addition](https://github.com/trueChristian/history.truechristian.church/issues/new?title=Correction%3A+Tertullian%E2%80%99S+Views+Concerning+Different+Other+Matters%2C+According+To+The+Account+Of+P.+J.+Twisck.&body=%23%23+Page+or+topic%0ATertullian%E2%80%99S+Views+Concerning+Different+Other+Matters%2C+According+To+The+Account+Of+P.+J.+Twisck.%0A%0APage%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fhistory.truechristian.church%2Fstories%2Fmm-tertullians-views-concerning-different-other-matters-according-to-the-account-of-p-j-twisck%2F%0A%0ARecord%3A+mm-tertullians-views-concerning-different-other-matters-according-to-the-account-of-p-j-twisck%0A%0ADate+currently+shown%3A+3rd+century+%28source+section%29%0A%0A%23%23+Correction+or+addition%0A%0A%0A%0A%23%23+Sources+and+evidence%0APlease+include+book%2Fpage+references%2C+archive+links%2C+or+first-hand+documentation.%0A%0A%0A%0A%23%23+Image+credit+%28if+applicable%29%0ACreator%2C+source%2C+and+permission+or+public-domain+basis.%0A%0A%0A%0ASubmitted+for+review%3B+this+issue+does+not+publish+changes+automatically.)
